The Arizona Cardinals vs Cincinnati Bengals match player stats from their October 8, 2023 meeting tell the story of a game shaped by explosive passing, turnovers, and one dominant wide receiver performance. Cincinnati defeated Arizona 34–20 at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, improving to 2–3, while the Cardinals dropped to 1–4. The Bengals produced 380 total net yards compared with Arizona’s 294 and controlled possession for more than 38 minutes.
The headline performance came from Cincinnati wide receiver Ja’Marr Chase, who caught 15 passes for 192 yards and three touchdowns. Quarterback Joe Burrow also delivered one of his strongest performances of the early 2023 season, completing 36 of 46 passes for 317 yards and three touchdowns. Arizona stayed competitive through much of the game, but turnovers and Cincinnati’s ability to produce decisive plays ultimately created the 14-point difference.
This breakdown examines the final score, quarterback statistics, rushing and receiving production, scoring plays, turnovers, team numbers, and the performances that determined the outcome.
Arizona Cardinals vs Cincinnati Bengals Match Overview
The Bengals entered the Week 5 matchup under pressure after starting the season 1–3. Arizona also came into the game at 1–3. Cincinnati responded with an important road victory, scoring in every quarter and finishing with a 34–20 win.
The game was played on Sunday, October 8, 2023, at State Farm Stadium. Cincinnati opened strongly with 10 unanswered points in the first quarter. Arizona responded with two touchdowns in the second quarter and briefly moved ahead 14–10.
That lead did not last.
A defensive touchdown from Cincinnati before halftime changed the direction of the game. The Bengals then opened the second half with a 63-yard Burrow-to-Chase touchdown. Arizona cut the deficit to four points later in the third quarter, but Cincinnati controlled the fourth quarter and scored the game’s final 10 points.
| Game Detail | Result |
|---|---|
| Match | Cincinnati Bengals vs Arizona Cardinals |
| Date | October 8, 2023 |
| Venue | State Farm Stadium |
| Location | Glendale, Arizona |
| Final Score | Bengals 34, Cardinals 20 |
| Bengals Record After Game | 2–3 |
| Cardinals Record After Game | 1–4 |
| Attendance | 62,651 |
The official final score and attendance are also recorded in historical game data.
Arizona Cardinals vs Cincinnati Bengals Score by Quarter
Looking at the scoring quarter by quarter helps explain how the game developed.
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Bengals | 10 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 34 |
| Arizona Cardinals | 0 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 20 |
Cincinnati’s ability to score in all four quarters mattered. Arizona generated its entire 20-point total during the middle two quarters and was held scoreless in both the first and fourth periods.
Cincinnati Bengals Player Stats
Joe Burrow Passing Stats
Joe Burrow produced the central quarterback performance of the game.
| Statistic | Joe Burrow |
|---|---|
| Completions | 36 |
| Attempts | 46 |
| Passing Yards | 317 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 108.1 |
Burrow completed approximately 78.3% of his passes. His three touchdown throws all went to Ja’Marr Chase, including the 63-yard touchdown early in the third quarter that gave Cincinnati greater control of the game. His longest completion was that 63-yard connection.
The numbers are especially significant when viewed against Cincinnati’s previous game. The Bengals had scored only three points in a 27–3 loss to Tennessee in Week 4. Against Arizona, their offense responded with 34 points and 380 total net yards.
Burrow was sacked three times for 30 yards and threw one interception, so the performance was not flawless. However, his accuracy and connection with Chase gave Cincinnati an advantage Arizona could not match.
Ja’Marr Chase’s Dominant Receiving Performance
No discussion of the Arizona Cardinals vs Cincinnati Bengals match player stats is complete without focusing on Ja’Marr Chase.
| Statistic | Ja’Marr Chase |
|---|---|
| Targets | 19 |
| Receptions | 15 |
| Receiving Yards | 192 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 3 |
| Longest Reception | 63 yards |
Chase accounted for more than half of Cincinnati’s completed passes and a major share of its passing yardage. He scored Cincinnati’s first offensive touchdown on a two-yard reception, delivered the biggest offensive play of the game with a 63-yard touchdown, and added a three-yard touchdown in the fourth quarter.
The volume was just as important as the explosive plays. Burrow targeted Chase 19 times, and Chase converted 15 of those opportunities into catches. That allowed Cincinnati to use him for short possession plays as well as downfield attacks.
His 192 receiving yards were more than the Cardinals’ entire net passing output of 152 yards. That comparison shows how much one Cincinnati receiver influenced the matchup.
Other Cincinnati Bengals Receiving Stats
Chase dominated the receiving numbers, but Cincinnati also received useful production from other targets.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ja’Marr Chase | 15 | 192 | 3 |
| Trenton Irwin | 8 | 60 | 0 |
| Tyler Boyd | 6 | 39 | 0 |
| Joe Mixon | 4 | 13 | 0 |
| Andrei Iosivas | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Chase Brown | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Kwamie Lassiter II | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Trenton Irwin provided an important secondary option with eight catches on 10 targets for 60 yards. Tyler Boyd added six receptions for 39 yards.
Those contributions helped prevent Arizona from focusing entirely on Chase. Even though Chase was clearly the primary target, Burrow was able to distribute the ball when needed.
Cincinnati Bengals Rushing Stats
Cincinnati’s passing attack received most of the attention, but the rushing game helped the Bengals sustain possessions.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Mixon | 25 | 81 | 0 |
| Joe Burrow | 4 | 7 | 0 |
| Trayveon Williams | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Joe Mixon handled the majority of Cincinnati’s rushing workload with 25 attempts for 81 yards. He did not score a rushing touchdown, but his workload helped Cincinnati control the football and maintain offensive balance.
The Bengals finished with 93 rushing yards as a team. Their rushing output was lower than Arizona’s, but Cincinnati did not need a huge rushing performance because Burrow and Chase were so effective through the air.
Arizona Cardinals Player Stats
Joshua Dobbs Passing Performance
Arizona quarterback Joshua Dobbs had a more difficult afternoon.
| Statistic | Joshua Dobbs |
|---|---|
| Completions | 15 |
| Attempts | 32 |
| Passing Yards | 166 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Passer Rating | 57.6 |
Dobbs completed 15 of 32 passes for 166 yards and two touchdowns, but his two interceptions became major problems. He was also sacked three times and lost a fumble.
One interception was especially damaging because Bengals cornerback Cam Taylor-Britt returned it 11 yards for a touchdown late in the second quarter. Arizona had taken a 14–10 lead earlier in the period, but that defensive score allowed Cincinnati to enter halftime ahead 17–14.
Dobbs did make productive touchdown throws to Marquise Brown and Zach Ertz. However, Arizona’s passing attack lacked Cincinnati’s consistency and explosive production.
Arizona Cardinals Receiving Stats
Marquise Brown led the Cardinals in receiving yards and scored one of their two passing touchdowns.
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marquise Brown | 4 | 61 | 1 |
| Rondale Moore | 3 | 26 | 0 |
| Geoff Swaim | 2 | 22 | 0 |
| Michael Wilson | 1 | 18 | 0 |
| Trey McBride | 2 | 17 | 0 |
| Emari Demercado | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Zach Ertz | 2 | 10 | 1 |
Brown caught four passes on 10 targets for 61 yards. His biggest play was a 25-yard touchdown reception in the second quarter that cut Cincinnati’s lead to 10–7.
Zach Ertz then caught a four-yard touchdown from Dobbs to put Arizona ahead 14–10.
Arizona spread its completions among several receivers, but no player approached Chase’s production. Brown was targeted frequently but caught only four of his 10 targets, while Chase caught 15 of his 19 opportunities for Cincinnati.
Arizona Cardinals Rushing Stats
Arizona actually outperformed Cincinnati on the ground.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rondale Moore | 3 | 50 | 0 |
| James Conner | 6 | 46 | 0 |
| Emari Demercado | 10 | 45 | 1 |
| Joshua Dobbs | 3 | 1 | 0 |
Rondale Moore produced 50 rushing yards on only three attempts, including a 41-yard run. James Conner added 46 yards on six carries, while Emari Demercado rushed 10 times for 45 yards and a touchdown.
Arizona finished with 142 rushing yards, compared with Cincinnati’s 93. That was one of the clearest statistical areas in which the Cardinals held an advantage.
However, rushing efficiency alone was not enough. Cincinnati’s passing advantage and Arizona’s turnovers outweighed the Cardinals’ stronger ground total.
Emari Demercado’s Important Contribution
Demercado became more important to Arizona’s offense during the game. He finished with 45 rushing yards on 10 carries and scored on an 11-yard run in the third quarter.
That touchdown brought Arizona within four points at 24–20. Matt Prater missed the extra-point attempt, leaving the Cardinals four points behind rather than three.
Demercado also caught one pass for 12 yards, giving him 57 yards from scrimmage.
Complete Scoring Summary
The scoring sequence shows several major momentum changes.
Cincinnati opened the scoring when Burrow found Chase for a two-yard touchdown. Evan McPherson then converted a 40-yard field goal, giving the Bengals a 10–0 advantage.
Arizona responded in the second quarter. Dobbs connected with Marquise Brown for a 25-yard touchdown and later found Zach Ertz for a four-yard score. Those touchdowns put Arizona ahead 14–10.
The game changed before halftime when Cam Taylor-Britt intercepted Dobbs and returned the ball 11 yards for a touchdown, sending Cincinnati into halftime with a 17–14 lead.
Early in the third quarter, Burrow hit Chase for a 63-yard touchdown. Demercado answered with an 11-yard rushing score, reducing Cincinnati’s lead to 24–20.
Arizona did not score again.
Burrow and Chase connected for their third touchdown in the fourth quarter, this time from three yards. McPherson later added another 40-yard field goal to complete the 34–20 final score.
Bengals vs Cardinals Team Stats Comparison
Individual performances become clearer when viewed alongside the overall team statistics.
| Category | Bengals | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| Final Score | 34 | 20 |
| Total Net Yards | 380 | 294 |
| Net Passing Yards | 287 | 152 |
| Rushing Yards | 93 | 142 |
| First Downs | 27 | 15 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 3 |
| Time of Possession | 38:10 | 21:50 |
| Penalties | 4 | 2 |
| Penalty Yards | 40 | 16 |
Cincinnati’s advantage in passing, first downs, possession and turnover margin explains much of the final result. The Bengals generated 27 first downs to Arizona’s 15 and held the ball for 38 minutes and 10 seconds.
Arizona’s 142 rushing yards were impressive, but the Cardinals could not translate that advantage into enough sustained scoring drives.
Turnovers Were a Deciding Factor
The turnover difference was one of the most important parts of the matchup.
Cincinnati committed one turnover, while Arizona finished with three.
Not every turnover has the same effect, and Taylor-Britt’s interception return was particularly valuable because Cincinnati scored without needing an offensive drive. Arizona had worked its way from a 10-point deficit to a four-point lead, but the pick-six reversed that momentum.
Turnovers also reduced Arizona’s opportunities to take advantage of its successful rushing attack. When a team loses possession before finishing a drive, strong rushing averages become much less valuable on the scoreboard.
Why Joe Burrow and Ja’Marr Chase Controlled the Game
The Burrow-Chase connection was the defining matchup.
Burrow attempted 46 passes, and 19 were directed at Chase. That means Chase was the intended receiver on more than 41% of Cincinnati’s pass attempts.
Chase converted those opportunities into 15 catches, 192 yards and all three of Burrow’s touchdown passes. His average was 12.8 yards per reception, but the overall number does not fully explain his impact.
He was useful in multiple areas of the field. Cincinnati could use him close to the goal line, on shorter possession routes and on explosive downfield plays. His touchdown receptions came from two, 63 and three yards, demonstrating that versatility.
Cincinnati’s Time-of-Possession Advantage
One of the less flashy but important statistics was Cincinnati’s possession time.
The Bengals held the football for 38:10, while Arizona had it for only 21:50.
That gap put pressure on Arizona’s defense and limited the number of opportunities available to the Cardinals’ offense. Cincinnati’s 27 first downs helped extend drives, while Mixon’s 25 rushing attempts provided a way to keep the clock moving.
The fourth quarter demonstrated the value of this approach. Cincinnati entered the period ahead 24–20, then added 10 unanswered points while Arizona failed to score.
Biggest Statistical Differences in the Match
Several numbers explain why Cincinnati won despite Arizona producing more rushing yards.
The first major difference was quarterback efficiency. Burrow completed 36 passes for 317 yards and three touchdowns. Dobbs completed 15 for 166 yards, with two touchdowns and two interceptions.
The second was receiving production. Chase alone recorded 192 receiving yards, compared with 166 gross passing yards from Dobbs.
The third difference was turnovers. Arizona’s three giveaways gave Cincinnati additional opportunities and included a direct defensive touchdown.
Finally, Cincinnati’s ability to extend drives produced 27 first downs and a huge possession advantage.
Together, those numbers tell a more complete story than the final score by itself.
What the Match Meant for Cincinnati
The victory moved Cincinnati from 1–3 to 2–3. It was an important response after the Bengals had lost 27–3 to the Tennessee Titans one week earlier.
Cincinnati followed the Arizona win by defeating Seattle 17–13 in Week 6 and later beat San Francisco 31–17 after its bye. The Arizona game therefore came during a period in which the Bengals began recovering from their difficult start.
For the offense, the game showed what Cincinnati could achieve when Burrow and Chase operated efficiently together.
What the Match Meant for Arizona
Arizona dropped to 1–4 with the defeat. The Cardinals had defeated Dallas 28–16 in Week 3 but then lost to San Francisco in Week 4 and Cincinnati in Week 5.
There were still positive signs in the Bengals game. Arizona rushed for 142 yards, produced 294 total yards and twice found the end zone through Dobbs. Demercado also contributed a rushing touchdown.
The problem was consistency. Arizona scored 20 points across the second and third quarters but nothing in the first or fourth. The turnovers made the challenge even greater.
Key Takeaways from Arizona Cardinals vs Cincinnati Bengals Match Player Stats
The most important takeaway is that Cincinnati’s passing game decided the matchup. Burrow’s 317 passing yards and three touchdowns combined with Chase’s 192 receiving yards and three scores to create an advantage Arizona could not overcome.
Arizona was more productive on the ground, but its passing game was less efficient. Dobbs’ turnovers were costly, especially the interception returned for a touchdown.
Cincinnati also controlled the structure of the game. More first downs and significantly more possession time allowed the Bengals to run more sustained offense. When Arizona pulled within four points in the third quarter, Cincinnati responded and shut the Cardinals out in the fourth.
Conclusion
The Arizona Cardinals vs Cincinnati Bengals match player stats show why Cincinnati earned a 34–20 road victory on October 8, 2023. Joe Burrow completed 36 of 46 passes for 317 yards and three touchdowns, while Ja’Marr Chase delivered the game’s standout individual performance with 15 receptions, 192 yards and three touchdowns.
Arizona had success on the ground, finishing with 142 rushing yards, and briefly held a 14–10 lead in the second quarter. However, three turnovers, limited passing production and Cincinnati’s ability to sustain drives changed the game. The Bengals finished with 380 total net yards, 27 first downs and more than 38 minutes of possession.
The final statistics reveal a game in which Arizona competed effectively for long stretches, but Cincinnati made the bigger plays. Chase supplied the explosive offense, Burrow delivered an efficient passing performance, Taylor-Britt produced a critical defensive touchdown, and the Bengals controlled the fourth quarter to secure the win.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Who won the Arizona Cardinals vs Cincinnati Bengals game?
The Cincinnati Bengals defeated the Arizona Cardinals 34–20 on October 8, 2023, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona. The victory improved Cincinnati’s record to 2–3.
What were Joe Burrow’s stats against the Arizona Cardinals?
Joe Burrow completed 36 of 46 passes for 317 yards, three touchdowns and one interception. He finished with a 108.1 passer rating, with all three touchdown passes going to Ja’Marr Chase.
What were Ja’Marr Chase’s stats against the Cardinals?
Ja’Marr Chase recorded 15 receptions for 192 receiving yards and three touchdowns on 19 targets. His longest reception was a 63-yard touchdown in the third quarter.
How did Joshua Dobbs perform against Cincinnati?
Joshua Dobbs completed 15 of 32 passes for 166 yards, two touchdowns and two interceptions. He also lost a fumble, while one of his interceptions was returned by Cam Taylor-Britt for a Cincinnati touchdown.
Which team had more total yards?
The Cincinnati Bengals finished with 380 total net yards, while the Arizona Cardinals recorded 294. Arizona led in rushing yards 142–93, but Cincinnati held a much larger advantage in net passing yards, 287–152.
Detroit Lions vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats: Complete Breakdown, Highlights & Analysis
Carolina Panthers vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Full Box Score, Highlights and Game Analysis
