The Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears match player stats from their November 23, 2025 meeting tell the story of one of the tighter interconference games of the season. Chicago defeated Pittsburgh 31-28 at Soldier Field, improving to 8-3, while the Steelers dropped to 6-5. Pittsburgh actually finished with more total offense, more rushing yards, more first downs, and more time of possession, but Chicago made enough decisive plays to secure the three-point victory.
Caleb Williams led the Bears’ passing attack with 239 yards and three touchdowns, while Mason Rudolph started for Pittsburgh in place of Aaron Rodgers and completed 24 of 31 passes for 171 yards. Kenneth Gainwell produced the biggest rushing performance of the afternoon with 92 yards on only 10 carries, and D.J. Moore became Chicago’s main scoring threat with two touchdown receptions.
This complete breakdown examines the final score, quarterback numbers, rushing and receiving production, defensive impact, turnovers, important scoring plays, and the statistics that ultimately decided the Steelers-Bears matchup.
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears Match Overview
The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago on November 23, 2025, as part of Week 12 of the NFL regular season. Chicago won 31-28. The Bears scored seven points in the first quarter, 10 in the second, seven in the third and seven in the fourth. Pittsburgh scored seven in the first, 14 in the second, none in the third and seven in the fourth.
| Game Detail | Pittsburgh Steelers | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| Final Score | 28 | 31 |
| Record after game | 6-5 | 8-3 |
| Total Yards | 345 | 328 |
| Net Passing Yards | 159 | 229 |
| Rushing Yards | 186 | 99 |
| First Downs | 22 | 19 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 2 |
| Time of Possession | 33:09 | 26:51 |
The table shows why the final result cannot be explained simply by total yardage. Pittsburgh gained 345 yards to Chicago’s 328 and controlled the football for more than 33 minutes. The Steelers also dominated the rushing comparison, 186-99. Chicago, however, had the more productive passing attack and converted its opportunities into enough points to win.
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats
Several individual performances shaped the contest. Williams supplied Chicago’s three passing touchdowns, Moore caught two of them, and Montez Sweat created pressure that resulted in two sacks and a forced fumble. For Pittsburgh, Gainwell provided explosive rushing production, Jaylen Warren scored on the ground, and T.J. Watt created a defensive touchdown opportunity with a strip-sack of Williams.
Key Player Statistics
| Player | Team | Key Stats |
|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | Bears | 19/35, 239 passing yards, 3 TD, 0 INT |
| Mason Rudolph | Steelers | 24/31, 171 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT |
| Kenneth Gainwell | Steelers | 10 carries, 92 yards; 6 catches, 30 yards |
| Jaylen Warren | Steelers | 18 carries, 68 yards, 1 TD |
| Kyle Monangai | Bears | 12 carries, 48 yards, 1 TD |
| D.J. Moore | Bears | 5 catches, 64 yards, 2 TD |
| Rome Odunze | Bears | 3 catches, 53 yards |
| Colston Loveland | Bears | 4 catches, 49 yards, 1 TD |
| Calvin Austin III | Steelers | 4 catches, 36 yards |
| Pat Freiermuth | Steelers | 3 catches, 19 yards, 1 TD |
These numbers reveal two very different offensive approaches. Chicago produced more explosive results through its quarterback and receivers, while Pittsburgh leaned heavily on its ground game and shorter passing concepts.
Caleb Williams’ Passing Performance
Caleb Williams was the central figure in Chicago’s offensive success. He completed 19 of 35 passes for 239 yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions, producing a passer rating of 104.3.
His completion percentage of 54.3% was not especially high, but the efficiency of his successful throws mattered more. Chicago generated touchdowns through the passing game rather than relying exclusively on long drives and rushing production.
Williams connected with D.J. Moore for two touchdowns and Colston Loveland for another. His first touchdown pass went five yards to Moore, Loveland later caught a 12-yard score, and Moore added a 25-yard touchdown in the third quarter.
Williams did make a costly mistake when T.J. Watt forced a fumble that Nick Herbig recovered in the end zone for a Pittsburgh touchdown. That turnover gave the Steelers seven defensive points and could have changed the game completely. Chicago nevertheless recovered and continued generating offense.
The contrast is important when evaluating Williams’ stat line. Pittsburgh’s pass rush created a major negative play, but Williams avoided interceptions and produced three touchdown passes. Those scoring throws ultimately outweighed the fumble.
Mason Rudolph’s Performance for Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh entered the game without Aaron Rodgers, leaving Mason Rudolph to start at quarterback. Rudolph completed 24 of 31 passes for 171 yards, one touchdown and one interception. His 77.4% completion rate was considerably higher than Williams’ percentage, although Pittsburgh generated fewer passing yards and fewer passing touchdowns.
That comparison demonstrates why completion percentage alone can be misleading. Rudolph consistently completed shorter passes and helped Pittsburgh sustain possessions, but Chicago’s passing game produced more yards and more scoring plays.
Rudolph’s touchdown came during Pittsburgh’s fourth-quarter comeback. He completed a three-yard pass to tight end Pat Freiermuth, reducing Chicago’s lead to 31-28 with 6:27 remaining.
Pittsburgh later received one final opportunity. Starting at its own 20 with 1:29 remaining, the offense advanced across midfield. On fourth-and-6 from Chicago’s 47-yard line, however, Rudolph’s pass was deflected at the line and fell incomplete, ending Pittsburgh’s comeback attempt.
Steelers Rushing Stats: Kenneth Gainwell Leads the Ground Game
Pittsburgh’s rushing performance was one of the strongest statistical features of the game. The Steelers accumulated 186 rushing yards on 36 attempts, averaging 5.2 yards per carry. Chicago finished with 99 rushing yards.
Kenneth Gainwell was particularly effective.
He rushed 10 times for 92 yards, an average of 9.2 yards per attempt, and added six receptions for 30 yards. That gave him 122 yards from scrimmage.
His biggest play came late in the second quarter. On fourth-and-1, Pittsburgh used a deceptive direct-snap design and Gainwell broke free for 55 yards before being pushed out at the Chicago 1-yard line. Jaylen Warren scored from one yard out on the following play.
Gainwell’s performance showed how explosive Pittsburgh could be when it created space at the line of scrimmage.
Jaylen Warren Adds 68 Yards and a Touchdown
Jaylen Warren complemented Gainwell with 68 yards on 18 rushing attempts and one touchdown.
His one-yard touchdown followed Gainwell’s long run and gave Pittsburgh a valuable second-quarter score.
The combination of Gainwell and Warren helped the Steelers control possession and finish with an 87-yard advantage in rushing production. Pittsburgh’s ability to run the football was one reason it recorded 22 first downs and kept possession for 33:09.
Chicago Bears Rushing Stats
Chicago’s rushing attack was quieter. The Bears gained 99 yards on 25 rushing attempts, averaging 4.0 yards per carry.
Kyle Monangai led the Bears with 48 yards on 12 attempts and one touchdown. His two-yard touchdown run gave Chicago an important fourth-quarter score.
Caleb Williams contributed 21 yards on four carries, while Luther Burden III gained 15 yards on one rushing attempt. D’Andre Swift was limited to 15 yards on eight attempts.
Chicago therefore did not need a dominant traditional running performance. The Bears’ passing touchdowns and defensive plays allowed them to overcome Pittsburgh’s clear advantage on the ground.
D.J. Moore Leads Chicago’s Receiving Attack
D.J. Moore was one of the most important players in the game. He caught five passes for 64 yards and two touchdowns on seven targets.
Moore’s first touchdown came on a five-yard pass from Williams in the opening quarter. His second was a much more explosive 25-yard touchdown reception in the third quarter. That score moved Chicago ahead 24-21 after Pittsburgh had taken a 21-17 advantage into halftime.
The value of Moore’s performance was not simply his receiving-yard total. Several players can record 60-plus receiving yards without dramatically affecting a game’s outcome. Moore turned his opportunities into 12 points before extra points, making him Chicago’s primary scoring receiver.
Rome Odunze and Colston Loveland
Rome Odunze caught three passes for 53 yards, averaging nearly 18 yards per reception. He did not score, but his ability to gain yards downfield contributed to Chicago’s passing advantage.
Colston Loveland recorded four receptions for 49 yards and one touchdown. His 12-yard touchdown reception tied the game at 14 during the second quarter.
Luther Burden III also contributed three catches for 46 yards. Chicago therefore received meaningful production from multiple receivers rather than depending entirely on Moore.
Pittsburgh Steelers Receiving Stats
Pittsburgh’s receiving numbers were more evenly distributed and generally shorter.
Calvin Austin III led the Steelers in receiving yardage with four catches for 36 yards. Gainwell caught all six of his listed targets for 30 yards, while D.K. Metcalf finished with five catches for 22 yards.
Darnell Washington caught two passes for 22 yards, Jonnu Smith had three catches for 21 yards, and Ben Skowronek recorded one 21-yard reception. Pat Freiermuth finished with three catches for 19 yards, but his touchdown made his relatively small yardage total significant.
Pittsburgh’s distribution demonstrates Rudolph’s approach. He completed a high percentage of his throws by spreading the football around, but the Steelers lacked the same passing-game explosiveness Chicago received from Moore, Odunze and Loveland.
Defensive Player Stats and Game-Changing Plays
Defense had a major influence on the final result.
For Pittsburgh, T.J. Watt produced one of the biggest defensive plays. Watt strip-sacked Caleb Williams in the end zone, and Nick Herbig recovered the loose football for a touchdown. Watt’s sack also carried historical significance, as it moved him to 115 career sacks, passing his brother J.J. Watt’s career total of 114.5.
Jalen Ramsey was credited with a team-high nine tackles for Pittsburgh.
Chicago’s Montez Sweat was equally disruptive. Sweat recorded two sacks, forced a fumble and recovered a fumble. His pressure on Rudolph in the third quarter produced one of the game’s critical turnovers.
D’Marco Jackson led Chicago with 15 tackles, while Nahshon Wright recorded an interception.
These defensive contributions mattered because the game featured very little separation between the teams. A sack, takeaway or red-zone stop had far greater value in a three-point game than raw yardage alone might suggest.
Turnovers and Why They Mattered
Both teams officially finished with two turnovers, but the timing and consequences of those mistakes played a major role in the outcome.
Pittsburgh received seven points directly from Chicago’s fumble when Herbig recovered in the end zone. Chicago, meanwhile, intercepted Rudolph and later received another possession when Sweat stripped him and recovered the fumble.
The Bears entered the contest as one of the league’s strongest takeaway teams. Following the Pittsburgh game, Chicago had produced 24 takeaways through 11 games.
That ability to create turnovers helped Chicago compensate for several areas in which Pittsburgh held statistical advantages.
How the Scoring Developed
Chicago opened the scoring when Williams found Moore for a five-yard touchdown. Pittsburgh answered with a six-yard D.K. Metcalf rushing touchdown, leaving the game tied at seven.
The second quarter became much more eventful.
Watt’s pressure on Williams created the fumble that Herbig recovered in the end zone, putting Pittsburgh ahead 14-7. Chicago responded when Williams connected with Loveland for a 12-yard touchdown.
Gainwell’s 55-yard run then placed Pittsburgh at the Chicago 1, and Warren scored to put the Steelers ahead 21-14. Cairo Santos kicked a 47-yard field goal before halftime, reducing Pittsburgh’s advantage to 21-17.
Chicago controlled the scoring in the third quarter. Williams found Moore for a 25-yard touchdown, giving the Bears a 24-21 lead.
Monangai’s two-yard rushing touchdown later extended Chicago’s advantage to 31-21.
Pittsburgh refused to disappear. Rudolph directed a long fourth-quarter drive and found Freiermuth for a three-yard touchdown, cutting the score to 31-28.
The Steelers eventually regained possession with 1:29 remaining and moved across midfield, but their final fourth-down attempt failed. Chicago escaped with the three-point win.
Team Stats Explain the Difference Between Production and Winning
Perhaps the most interesting part of the Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears match player stats is that Pittsburgh led many conventional statistical categories.
The Steelers had more total yards, 345-328. They had more first downs, 22-19. They ran for 186 yards compared with Chicago’s 99. They possessed the football for 33:09 compared with 26:51. Both teams had two turnovers.
Yet Chicago won.
The Bears gained 229 net passing yards compared with Pittsburgh’s 159 and generated three passing touchdowns. Pittsburgh’s passing game produced one.
That difference highlights the importance of explosive and scoring plays. Pittsburgh could move the chains and control possession, but Chicago turned its passing opportunities into touchdowns.
Quarterback Comparison: Williams vs Rudolph
Williams and Rudolph provide an interesting statistical contrast.
| Statistic | Caleb Williams | Mason Rudolph |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 19 | 24 |
| Attempts | 35 | 31 |
| Passing Yards | 239 | 171 |
| Passing TD | 3 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Completion % | 54.3% | 77.4% |
| Passer Rating | 104.3 | 86.9 |
Rudolph completed five more passes despite attempting four fewer throws. Williams, however, produced 68 more passing yards and two additional touchdowns.
Williams’ 104.3 passer rating also reflected the greater scoring efficiency of Chicago’s passing game.
For anyone analyzing player statistics rather than simply counting completions, this is a useful example of why yards per completion, touchdowns, turnovers and situational success must be considered alongside completion percentage.
Most Important Players in the Match
Several players deserve special attention when assessing the outcome.
Caleb Williams was arguably Chicago’s most influential offensive player because three of the Bears’ four touchdowns came from his passes.
D.J. Moore was the primary receiving difference-maker with 64 yards and two touchdowns.
Kenneth Gainwell was Pittsburgh’s most explosive offensive weapon, generating 122 yards from scrimmage and producing the 55-yard run that set up Warren’s touchdown.
T.J. Watt created Pittsburgh’s biggest defensive moment by forcing the Williams fumble recovered for a touchdown.
Montez Sweat created critical pressure for Chicago, recording two sacks and forcing a Rudolph fumble.
The game therefore was not controlled by a single statistical category. Quarterback efficiency, explosive rushing, pass rushing, takeaways and red-zone execution all influenced the final result.
Steelers vs Bears Head-to-Head Context
The 2025 result added another chapter to a matchup with a long history. Following the game, Chicago held a 20-8-1 regular-season advantage in the all-time series.
The previous meeting had occurred on November 8, 2021, when Pittsburgh defeated Chicago 29-27. That game was also decided by a very small margin.
The 2025 result reversed the winner but continued the recent pattern of close Steelers-Bears meetings.
Chicago has also historically been difficult for Pittsburgh to beat on the road. The Steelers’ official site noted after the 2025 loss that it represented Pittsburgh’s 15th loss in 16 trips to face the Bears in Chicago since the series began in 1934.
What the Player Stats Tell Us About the Game
Looking beyond the final score, the statistics reveal three major themes.
First, Pittsburgh’s rushing offense was highly effective. Gainwell and Warren helped the Steelers nearly double Chicago’s rushing total.
Second, Chicago’s passing offense was more dangerous. Williams did not complete as many passes as Rudolph, but his completions produced more yards and three touchdowns.
Third, defensive splash plays kept changing momentum. Watt and Herbig combined for a defensive touchdown, while Sweat’s pressure created an important Pittsburgh turnover.
The matchup is therefore a useful example of why NFL games cannot always be explained by possession time or total yardage. Pittsburgh controlled several traditional categories without controlling the final score.
Conclusion
The Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears match player stats show just how close the November 23, 2025 contest really was. Chicago won 31-28, even though Pittsburgh finished ahead in total yards, rushing yards, first downs and possession time.
Caleb Williams made the biggest difference through the air, finishing with 239 passing yards and three touchdowns. D.J. Moore turned five catches into 64 yards and two scores, while Colston Loveland added another receiving touchdown. Kyle Monangai provided Chicago’s rushing touchdown.
For Pittsburgh, Mason Rudolph completed 24 of 31 passes for 171 yards and a touchdown, while Kenneth Gainwell delivered an excellent all-around performance with 92 rushing yards and 30 receiving yards. Jaylen Warren added 68 rushing yards and a touchdown. T.J. Watt’s strip-sack also created a defensive touchdown when Nick Herbig recovered the football in the end zone.
Ultimately, Chicago’s ability to create scoring plays through the passing game and produce timely defensive pressure outweighed Pittsburgh’s advantages in rushing and possession. The 31-28 result was a reminder that efficiency in decisive moments can matter more than simply winning the total-yardage battle.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Who won the Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears game in 2025?
The Chicago Bears defeated the Pittsburgh Steelers 31-28 at Soldier Field on November 23, 2025. Chicago improved to 8-3, while Pittsburgh moved to 6-5.
What were Caleb Williams’ stats against the Steelers?
Caleb Williams completed 19 of 35 passes for 239 yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions. He finished with a 104.3 passer rating.
What were Mason Rudolph’s stats against the Bears?
Mason Rudolph completed 24 of 31 passes for 171 yards, one touchdown and one interception. He also led Pittsburgh on a late touchdown drive that brought the Steelers within three points.
Who had the most rushing yards in Steelers vs Bears?
Kenneth Gainwell led all players with 92 rushing yards on 10 attempts. He also caught six passes for 30 yards, giving him 122 yards from scrimmage.
Who scored touchdowns in the Steelers vs Bears game?
For Chicago, D.J. Moore caught two touchdown passes, Colston Loveland caught one, and Kyle Monangai scored a rushing touchdown. Pittsburgh received touchdowns from D.K. Metcalf, Jaylen Warren, Nick Herbig on a fumble recovery, and Pat Freiermuth on a pass from Mason Rudolph.
Denver Broncos vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Complete Breakdown and Analysis
Detroit Lions vs Dallas Cowboys Match Player Stats: Full 2024 Game Breakdown
